Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G vs Sucre fleurs de coco
Overall, Sucre fleurs de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Sucre fleurs de coco
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de fleur de coco en po... | Sucre fleurs de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 383 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 93 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre fleurs de coco has 38% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Sucre de fleur de coco*. *ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Sucre fleurs de coco
100% sucre de fleurs de coco biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G or Sucre fleurs de coco?
Overall, Sucre fleurs de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has less sugar: 90 g versus 93 g per 100 g.