Sucre fleurs de coco vs Sucre de coco
Overall, Sucre de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre fleurs de coco | Sucre de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 93 g | 93 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de coco has no fat, while Sucre fleurs de coco has 0.5 g.
- Sucre fleurs de coco has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
- Sucre de coco has 30% more protein (2 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Sucre fleurs de coco
100% sucre de fleurs de coco biologique
Sucre de coco
Sucre de coco
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre fleurs de coco or Sucre de coco?
Overall, Sucre de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de coco has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre fleurs de coco has less sugar: 93 g versus 93 g per 100 g.