Sucre de canne complet vs Sucre Complet Muscovado
Overall, Sucre de canne complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sucre de canne complet
Sucre Complet Muscovado
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de canne complet | Sucre Complet Muscovado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 394 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 96 g | 95 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de canne complet has 50% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de canne complet
100% sucre de canne complet biologique. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque
Sucre Complet Muscovado
Sucre de canne complet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de canne complet or Sucre Complet Muscovado?
Overall, Sucre de canne complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de canne complet has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre Complet Muscovado has less sugar: 95 g versus 96 g per 100 g.