Sucre de coco vs Sucre de canne complet
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de coco | Sucre de canne complet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 96 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de coco has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Sucre de canne complet has 40% more protein (1 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de coco
100 % sucre de fleur de noix de coco* (Cocos Nucifera) *Issu de l'Agriculture Biologique.
Sucre de canne complet
100% sucre de canne complet biologique. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de coco or Sucre de canne complet?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de coco has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de coco has less sugar: 90 g versus 96 g per 100 g.