Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné vs Sucre de canne complet
Overall, Sucre de canne complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné
Sucre de canne complet
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de Fleur de coco non r... | Sucre de canne complet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | — | 2 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 95 g | 96 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de canne complet has no fat, while Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 0.5 g.
- Sucre de canne complet has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.3 g).
- Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné
Sucre de sève de fleur de cocotier. Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Sucre de canne complet
100% sucre de canne complet biologique. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné or Sucre de canne complet?
Overall, Sucre de canne complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has less sugar: 95 g versus 96 g per 100 g.