Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné vs Sucre Complet Muscovado
Overall, Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné
Sucre Complet Muscovado
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de Fleur de coco non r... | Sucre Complet Muscovado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 2 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 394 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 95 g | 95 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre Complet Muscovado has no fat, while Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 0.5 g.
- Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has 55% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné
Sucre de sève de fleur de cocotier. Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Sucre Complet Muscovado
Sucre de canne complet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné or Sucre Complet Muscovado?
Overall, Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de Fleur de coco non raffiné has less sugar: 95 g versus 95 g per 100 g.