Sucre de canne complet vs Sucre de canne complet non raffiné
Overall, Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sucre de canne complet
Sucre de canne complet non raffiné
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de canne complet | Sucre de canne complet non r... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 387 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 96 g | 68 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has 29% less sugar (68 g vs 96 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de canne complet
100% sucre de canne complet biologique. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque
Sucre de canne complet non raffiné
Sucre de canne complet (non raffiné) issu de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de canne complet or Sucre de canne complet non raffiné?
Overall, Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de canne complet non raffiné has less sugar: 68 g versus 96 g per 100 g.