Sucralose vs Sucralose Granulated Sweetener
Overall, Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucralose | Sucralose Granulated Sweeten... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 6.8 g | 6.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 71% more protein (1.7 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Sucralose
Maltodextrine, édulcorant : sucralose (1%).
Sucralose Granulated Sweetener
maltodextrin, sweetener: sucralose (1%), dietary advice: suitable for vegetarians, this pack is
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucralose or Sucralose Granulated Sweetener?
Overall, Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucralose has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.