Sucralose Granulated Sweetener vs Sucralose
Overall, Sucralose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucralose Granulated Sweeten... | Sucralose |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucralose has 100% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Sucralose has no fat, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 0.5 g.
- Sucralose has no saturated fat, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 0.3 g.
- Sucralose has 92% less sugar (0.5 g vs 6.2 g).
- Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 100% more protein (1.7 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sucralose Granulated Sweetener
maltodextrin, sweetener: sucralose (1%), dietary advice: suitable for vegetarians, this pack is
Sucralose
Eau, édulcorants (sucralose, fructose), correcteur d'acuité E330, conservateur E202.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucralose Granulated Sweetener or Sucralose?
Overall, Sucralose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucralose has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucralose has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.