Comparison

Sucralose Granulated Sweetener vs Sucralosa líquida

Overall, Sucralosa líquida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSucralose Granulated Sweeten...Sucralosa líquida
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 400 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0 g
Sugars 6.2 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 1.7 g 0 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sucralosa líquida has no calories, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 400 kcal.
  • Sucralosa líquida has no fat, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 0.5 g.
  • Sucralosa líquida has no saturated fat, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 0.3 g.
  • Sucralosa líquida has no sugar, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 6.2 g.
  • Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 100% more protein (1.7 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Sucralose Granulated Sweetener

maltodextrin, sweetener: sucralose (1%), dietary advice: suitable for vegetarians, this pack is

Sucralosa líquida

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucralose Granulated Sweetener or Sucralosa líquida?

Overall, Sucralosa líquida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sucralosa líquida has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sucralosa líquida has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons