Comparison

Edulcorel vs Sucralose Granulated Sweetener

Overall, Edulcorel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEdulcorelSucralose Granulated Sweeten...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 394 kcal 400 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 6.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 0.5 g 1.7 g
Additives21
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Edulcorel has no fat, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 0.5 g.
  • Edulcorel has no saturated fat, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 0.3 g.
  • Edulcorel has no sugar, while Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 6.2 g.
  • Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Sucralose Granulated Sweetener has 71% more protein (1.7 g vs 0.5 g).

Ingredients

Edulcorel

E968, E960a

Sucralose Granulated Sweetener

maltodextrin, sweetener: sucralose (1%), dietary advice: suitable for vegetarians, this pack is

FAQ

Which is healthier: Edulcorel or Sucralose Granulated Sweetener?

Overall, Edulcorel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Edulcorel has fewer calories: 394 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Edulcorel has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons