Edulcorel vs Sucralose sweetner tablets
Overall, Edulcorel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edulcorel | Sucralose sweetner tablets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 394 kcal | 325 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 73 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucralose sweetner tablets has 18% fewer calories (325 kcal vs 394 kcal).
- Edulcorel has no fat, while Sucralose sweetner tablets has 0.5 g.
- Edulcorel has no sugar, while Sucralose sweetner tablets has 73 g.
- Edulcorel has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Sucralose sweetner tablets has 86% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Edulcorel
E968, E960a
Sucralose sweetner tablets
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edulcorel or Sucralose sweetner tablets?
Overall, Edulcorel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucralose sweetner tablets has fewer calories: 325 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edulcorel has less sugar: 0 g versus 73 g per 100 g.