Comparison

Edulcorel vs Sucralose sweetner tablets

Overall, Edulcorel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEdulcorelSucralose sweetner tablets
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 394 kcal 325 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 73 g
Salt 0 g 0.4 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.5 g 3.6 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sucralose sweetner tablets has 18% fewer calories (325 kcal vs 394 kcal).
  • Edulcorel has no fat, while Sucralose sweetner tablets has 0.5 g.
  • Edulcorel has no sugar, while Sucralose sweetner tablets has 73 g.
  • Edulcorel has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Sucralose sweetner tablets has 86% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.5 g).

Ingredients

Edulcorel

E968, E960a

Sucralose sweetner tablets

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Edulcorel or Sucralose sweetner tablets?

Overall, Edulcorel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sucralose sweetner tablets has fewer calories: 325 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Edulcorel has less sugar: 0 g versus 73 g per 100 g.

More comparisons