Comparison
Edulcorel vs Sucralose
Overall, Edulcorel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edulcorel | Sucralose |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 394 kcal | 386 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 6.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edulcorel has no fat, while Sucralose has 0.5 g.
- Edulcorel has no sugar, while Sucralose has 6.8 g.
- Sucralose has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Edulcorel
E968, E960a
Sucralose
Maltodextrine, édulcorant : sucralose (1%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edulcorel or Sucralose?
Overall, Edulcorel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucralose has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edulcorel has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.