Comparison

Steaks Charolais Label Rouge vs Dry Aged Beef Burgers

Overall, Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSteaks Charolais Label RougeDry Aged Beef Burgers
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 115 kcal 216 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 14.9 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.6 g
Protein 23 g 19.1 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedBeef

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has 47% fewer calories (115 kcal vs 216 kcal).
  • Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has 85% less fat (2.3 g vs 14.9 g).
  • Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has 89% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 7 g).
  • Dry Aged Beef Burgers has no sugar, while Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has 0.5 g.
  • Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has 17% more protein (23 g vs 19.1 g).
  • Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Steaks Charolais Label Rouge is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Dry Aged Beef Burgers lists: Beef.

Ingredients

Steaks Charolais Label Rouge

boeuf

Dry Aged Beef Burgers

Beef (82%), Dry Aged Beef (10%), water, rice flour, chickpea flour, sea salt, black pepper, cornflour, salt, preservative: sodium metabisulphite, dextrose. For allergens see ingredients in bold.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Steaks Charolais Label Rouge or Dry Aged Beef Burgers?

Overall, Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Steaks Charolais Label Rouge has fewer calories: 115 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dry Aged Beef Burgers has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons