Steak Haché à l'oignon vs Block Burger
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steak Haché à l'oignon | Block Burger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 205 kcal | 246 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.6 g | 8.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak Haché à l'oignon has 17% fewer calories (205 kcal vs 246 kcal).
- Steak Haché à l'oignon has 25% less fat (15 g vs 20 g).
- Steak Haché à l'oignon has 34% less saturated fat (5.6 g vs 8.5 g).
- Block Burger has no sugar, while Steak Haché à l'oignon has 2 g.
- Block Burger has 27% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
- Steak Haché à l'oignon has 100% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0 g).
- Block Burger has 24% more protein (17 g vs 13 g).
- Block Burger is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Steak Haché à l'oignon lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Steak Haché à l'oignon
51% viande bovine hachée (origine: France), 24% protéines de soja réhydratées, eau, 7,5% oignons frits réhydratés (oignons, huile de tournesol et/ou colza), chapelure (farine de blé, levure), 1,9% oignons en poudre réhydratés, sel, arômes naturels, poudre de betterave rouge. Traces éventuelles de gluten et de lait.
Block Burger
Rindfleisch (98 %), Salz, Gewürze.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steak Haché à l'oignon or Block Burger?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak Haché à l'oignon has fewer calories: 205 kcal versus 246 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Block Burger has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.