Steak de cheval vs Battuta di equino
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steak de cheval | Battuta di equino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 129 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 22.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak de cheval has 21% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 129 kcal).
- Steak de cheval has 54% less fat (1.9 g vs 4.1 g).
- Steak de cheval has 41% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Steak de cheval has no sugar, while Battuta di equino has 0.3 g.
- Steak de cheval has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Steak de cheval has the better Nutri-Score.
- Steak de cheval is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Steak de cheval
Viande de cheval.
Battuta di equino
carne di equini, sale, destrosio, conservante: E250-E251, Olio extravergine di oliva, pepe nero macinato
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steak de cheval or Battuta di equino?
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak de cheval has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 129 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steak de cheval has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.