Warcollier vs Steak de cheval
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Warcollier | Steak de cheval |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 365 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 38.8 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak de cheval has 72% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 365 kcal).
- Steak de cheval has 92% less fat (1.9 g vs 22.5 g).
- Steak de cheval has 90% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 9.2 g).
- Steak de cheval has no sugar, while Warcollier has 0.7 g.
- Steak de cheval has 98% less salt (0.1 g vs 4.6 g).
- Warcollier has 46% more protein (38.8 g vs 21 g).
- Steak de cheval has the better Nutri-Score.
- Steak de cheval is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Warcollier lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Warcollier
lukanka from veal , horse meat ingredients: dry salami, made by 50% veal and 50% horse meat, salt, sugar, natural spices, preservative-rosemary extract and potassium nitrate, antioxidant - ascorbic acid, natural product free of gmo, gluten and meat substitutes, 100g ready product are made by 182g fresh meat, casing-inedible, storage conditions: 0° 8°c
Steak de cheval
Viande de cheval.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Warcollier or Steak de cheval?
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak de cheval has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steak de cheval has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.