Comparison

Warcollier vs Macinato scelto equino

Overall, Macinato scelto equino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWarcollierMacinato scelto equino
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 365 kcal 108 kcal
Fat 22.5 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 9.2 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.7 g 1.2 g
Salt 4.6 g 0.6 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 38.8 g 21 g
Additives11
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Macinato scelto equino has 70% fewer calories (108 kcal vs 365 kcal).
  • Macinato scelto equino has 92% less fat (1.9 g vs 22.5 g).
  • Macinato scelto equino has 92% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Warcollier has 42% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Macinato scelto equino has 87% less salt (0.6 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Warcollier has 46% more protein (38.8 g vs 21 g).
  • Macinato scelto equino has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Warcollier lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Warcollier

lukanka from veal , horse meat ingredients: dry salami, made by 50% veal and 50% horse meat, salt, sugar, natural spices, preservative-rosemary extract and potassium nitrate, antioxidant - ascorbic acid, natural product free of gmo, gluten and meat substitutes, 100g ready product are made by 182g fresh meat, casing-inedible, storage conditions: 0° 8°c

Macinato scelto equino

Carne di cavallo, antiossidante: E300, acido ascorbico, destrosio, saccarosio, sale.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Warcollier or Macinato scelto equino?

Overall, Macinato scelto equino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Macinato scelto equino has fewer calories: 108 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Warcollier has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons