Salame di cavallo Ticino vs Steak de cheval
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salame di cavallo Ticino | Steak de cheval |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 30.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak de cheval has 72% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 368 kcal).
- Steak de cheval has 94% less fat (1.9 g vs 30.7 g).
- Steak de cheval has 93% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 13.3 g).
- Steak de cheval has 98% less salt (0.1 g vs 4.3 g).
- Steak de cheval has the better Nutri-Score.
- Steak de cheval is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Salame di cavallo Ticino
Carne di Equino 68%, Carne di Suino (ORIGINE: 100% ITALIANO), sale. aromi, spezie, destrosio, arami naturali. Antiossidante E301 Conservante E252-E250.
Steak de cheval
Viande de cheval.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salame di cavallo Ticino or Steak de cheval?
Overall, Steak de cheval has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak de cheval has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salame di cavallo Ticino has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.