Salame di cavallo Ticino vs Battuta di equino
Overall, Battuta di equino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salame di cavallo Ticino | Battuta di equino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 129 kcal |
| Fat | 30.7 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 22.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Battuta di equino has 65% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 368 kcal).
- Battuta di equino has 87% less fat (4.1 g vs 30.7 g).
- Battuta di equino has 89% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 13.3 g).
- Salame di cavallo Ticino has no sugar, while Battuta di equino has 0.3 g.
- Battuta di equino has 51% less salt (2.1 g vs 4.3 g).
- Battuta di equino has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Salame di cavallo Ticino
Carne di Equino 68%, Carne di Suino (ORIGINE: 100% ITALIANO), sale. aromi, spezie, destrosio, arami naturali. Antiossidante E301 Conservante E252-E250.
Battuta di equino
carne di equini, sale, destrosio, conservante: E250-E251, Olio extravergine di oliva, pepe nero macinato
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salame di cavallo Ticino or Battuta di equino?
Overall, Battuta di equino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Battuta di equino has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salame di cavallo Ticino has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.