Starbucks Cappuccino vs Torabika Cappuccino
Overall, Starbucks Cappuccino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Starbucks Cappuccino | Torabika Cappuccino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 69 kcal | 440 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 8.5 g | 60 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 7 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Starbucks Cappuccino has 84% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 440 kcal).
- Starbucks Cappuccino has 75% less fat (2.5 g vs 10 g).
- Starbucks Cappuccino has 84% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 10 g).
- Starbucks Cappuccino has 86% less sugar (8.5 g vs 60 g).
- Starbucks Cappuccino has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Torabika Cappuccino has 32% more protein (4 g vs 2.7 g).
Ingredients
Starbucks Cappuccino
_lait_ (contient 3,0% de matières grasses) 75%, café arabica Starbucks® (eau, extrait de café) 19,8%, sucre, cacao maigre en poudre 0,1%, correcteur d'acidité (carbonates de potassium), stabilisants (carraghénanes, gomme guar), émulsifiants (mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras d'origine végétale), arôme naturel, arôme.
Torabika Cappuccino
sugar, foaming creamer (glucose syrup solids, vegetable fat milk solids, stabilser e340i, emulsifier e481, vanila flavouring (artifical) non dary creamer (glucose syrup, hydrogenated vegetable fat (coconut and or palm kernel oili, sodium caseinate di-potassium phosphate (e340) emulsfier e471, e481), sodium polyphosphate (e452i), silicon dioxide (e551) instant coffee, cappuccino favour (artificial) choco granule ingredients: sugar, malt extract, skim milk powder, non dairy creamer (glucose syrup, hydrogenated vegetable fat (coconut and/or palm kernel oil), sodium caseinate, dipotassium phosphate (e340), emulsifier (e471, e481), sodium polyphosphate (e452), silicon dioxide (e551)), cocoa powder, chocolate flavour (artifical) vanillin, e481 sodium stearoyl lactylate made from refined fatty acids of vegetable origin e471 is mano and diglycendes of fatty acids, manufactured from edibie fully hydrogenated vegelable oil,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Starbucks Cappuccino or Torabika Cappuccino?
Overall, Starbucks Cappuccino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Starbucks Cappuccino has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 440 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Starbucks Cappuccino has less sugar: 8.5 g versus 60 g per 100 g.