Comparison

Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost vs Fruits des bois

Overall, Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSparkling Protein Citrus Fro...Fruits des bois
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 37 kcal 267 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 48.2 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 8.5 g 0 g
Additives56
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has 86% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 267 kcal).
  • Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has no sugar, while Fruits des bois has 48.2 g.
  • Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has 100% more protein (8.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost

Carbonated Water, Whey Protein Isolate, Bovine Collagen Peptides, L-Malic Acid, Sucralose, Sodium Benzoate, Potassium Sorbate, Phosphoric Acid, Natural Flavors.

Fruits des bois

Dextrose monohydrate, acide citrique, bicarbonate de potassium, sels de magnésium de l'acide citrique, polyrthylenelycol, hydrogénocarbonate de sodium, chlorure de potassium, chlorure de sodium, arôme naturel, sucralose, citrate de zinc, sulfate de manganèse.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost or Fruits des bois?

Overall, Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 267 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sparkling Protein Citrus Frost has less sugar: 0 g versus 48.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons