Comparison

Sokeroimaton luumu jogurtti vs Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0%

Overall, Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSokeroimaton luumu jogurttiSaison Pruneau-Cannelle 0%
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 75 kcal 47 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 0.1 g
Sugars 7.9 g 5.1 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 1.2 g
Protein 2.7 g 4.6 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has 37% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 75 kcal).
  • Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has 97% less fat (0.1 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has 95% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has 35% less sugar (5.1 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has 41% more protein (4.6 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Sokeroimaton luumu jogurtti

Pastöroitu maitojuoma (Suomi), luumu (13,5 %), hapate, luontaiset aromit.

Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0%

Lait maigre, pruneaux 10 % (morceaux et jus à base de concentré), protéines de lait, lait écrémé concentré, fibres alimentaires (inuline), jus de citron à base de concentré, cannelle, jus concentré de carotte noire, ârome, lait maigre en poudre, édulcorants (aspartame, acésulfame K)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sokeroimaton luumu jogurtti or Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0%?

Overall, Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saison Pruneau-Cannelle 0% has less sugar: 5.1 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons