Comparison

Soja chocolat biologique vs Suklaanmakuinen soijajuoma

Overall, Suklaanmakuinen soijajuoma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSoja chocolat biologiqueSuklaanmakuinen soijajuoma
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 69 kcal 74 kcal
Fat 2 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.6 g
Sugars 8.5 g 4.9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1.2 g 1.3 g
Protein 3.5 g 6 g
Additives24
AllergensSoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Soja chocolat biologique has 33% less fat (2 g vs 3 g).
  • Suklaanmakuinen soijajuoma has 42% less sugar (4.9 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Suklaanmakuinen soijajuoma has 42% more protein (6 g vs 3.5 g).

Ingredients

Soja chocolat biologique

Jus de SOJA* 91% (origine France), sucre de canne*, chocolat en poudre* 1% (sucre*, cacao*) (origine Amérique du Sud, Amérique centrale et Afrique), cacao maigre en poudre* 0,7% arôme naturel de cacao épaississants : carraghénanes, gomme xanthane sel marin. * biologique.

Suklaanmakuinen soijajuoma

soy base (water, shelled soybeans (12%)), sugar, low-fat cocoa powder (1,6%), pea protein, sea salt, calcium carbonate, stabilizer (gellan gum), acidity regulator (potassium phosphates), flavourings, vitamins (b2, d2),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Soja chocolat biologique or Suklaanmakuinen soijajuoma?

Overall, Suklaanmakuinen soijajuoma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Soja chocolat biologique has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 74 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Suklaanmakuinen soijajuoma has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons