Comparison

Śmietanka 30% vs Thick cream analogue

Overall, Thick cream analogue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientŚmietanka 30%Thick cream analogue
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 292 kcal 59 kcal
Fat 30 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 18 g 21 g
Sugars 3.3 g 3.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 2.2 g 2.2 g
Additives12
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Thick cream analogue has 80% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 292 kcal).
  • Thick cream analogue has 88% less fat (3.5 g vs 30 g).
  • Śmietanka 30% has 14% less saturated fat (18 g vs 21 g).
  • Only Śmietanka 30% lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Śmietanka 30%

_Śmietanka_, białka _mleka_, stabilizator. karagen

Thick cream analogue

Water, non hydrogenated refined palm kernel oil, skimmed cow’s milk powder, milk fat, emulsifier (e471 from palm/rapeseed/sunflower oil), stabilizers (e401). 25% fat

FAQ

Which is healthier: Śmietanka 30% or Thick cream analogue?

Overall, Thick cream analogue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Thick cream analogue has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Śmietanka 30% has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons