Sliced Focaccia vs Italian Style Focaccia
Overall, Sliced Focaccia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sliced Focaccia | Italian Style Focaccia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 227 kcal | 272 kcal |
| Fat | 4.6 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 6 | 6 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sliced Focaccia has 17% fewer calories (227 kcal vs 272 kcal).
- Sliced Focaccia has 17% less fat (4.6 g vs 5.5 g).
- Sliced Focaccia has 17% less sugar (3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Italian Style Focaccia has 16% more fiber (3.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Italian Style Focaccia has 17% more protein (10 g vs 8.3 g).
Ingredients
Sliced Focaccia
Wheat Flour (_Wheat_ Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin), Water, Extra Virgin Olive Oil 6%, Yeast, Spirit Vinegar, Raising Agents (Disodium Diphosphate, Sodium Hydrogen Carbonate, Calcium Phosphate), Salt, Preservative (Calcium Propionate), _Wheat_ Starch.
Italian Style Focaccia
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin), Water, Extra Virgin Olive Oil (4.5%), Yeast, Spirit Vinegar, Raising Agents (Disodium Diphosphate, Sodium Hydrogen Carbonate, Calcium Phosphate), Salt, Preservative (Calcium Propionate), Wheat Starch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sliced Focaccia or Italian Style Focaccia?
Overall, Sliced Focaccia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sliced Focaccia has fewer calories: 227 kcal versus 272 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sliced Focaccia has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.