Comparison

Sliced beetroot vs Savers beetroot

Overall, Savers beetroot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSliced beetrootSavers beetroot
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 51 kcal 49 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 8.8 g 8.7 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.1 g 1.1 g
Protein 1.1 g 1.6 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Savers beetroot has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Sliced beetroot has 48% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Savers beetroot has 31% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Savers beetroot is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Sliced beetroot

Beetroot (61%), Water, Sugar, Acidity Regulator (260), Salt.

Savers beetroot

cooked beetroot

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sliced beetroot or Savers beetroot?

Overall, Savers beetroot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Savers beetroot has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 51 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Savers beetroot has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 8.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons