Sliced beetroot vs Savers beetroot
Overall, Savers beetroot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sliced beetroot | Savers beetroot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 51 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 8.8 g | 8.7 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Savers beetroot has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Sliced beetroot has 48% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Savers beetroot has 31% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Savers beetroot is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sliced beetroot
Beetroot (61%), Water, Sugar, Acidity Regulator (260), Salt.
Savers beetroot
cooked beetroot
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sliced beetroot or Savers beetroot?
Overall, Savers beetroot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Savers beetroot has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 51 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Savers beetroot has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 8.8 g per 100 g.