Sirop de liege a l'ancien système vs Rinse appelstroop
Overall, Sirop de liege a l'ancien système has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sirop de liege a l'ancien sy... | Rinse appelstroop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 232 kcal | 275 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 64.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sirop de liege a l'ancien système has 16% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 275 kcal).
- Sirop de liege a l'ancien système has 38% less sugar (40 g vs 64.4 g).
- Rinse appelstroop has 35% more protein (1.7 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Sirop de liege a l'ancien système
jus concentré de pommes et de poires cuites. Préparé avec 800g de fruits (proportion variable) pour 100g de sirop. Sans ajout de sUcre, de colorants, de conservateurs ou nur additifs. Teneur totale en sucres de fruits:40g pour 100g Appel
Rinse appelstroop
Suikerbietenconcentraat, appelconcentraat, geleermiddel: pectine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sirop de liege a l'ancien système or Rinse appelstroop?
Overall, Sirop de liege a l'ancien système has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sirop de liege a l'ancien système has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 275 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sirop de liege a l'ancien système has less sugar: 40 g versus 64.4 g per 100 g.