Schenk Stroop, Suikerstroop vs Rinse appelstroop
Overall, Rinse appelstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schenk Stroop, Suikerstroop | Rinse appelstroop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 288 kcal | 275 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 72 g | 64.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rinse appelstroop has 11% less sugar (64.4 g vs 72 g).
- Rinse appelstroop has 100% more fiber (6.8 g vs 0 g).
- Rinse appelstroop has 100% more protein (1.7 g vs 0 g).
- Schenk Stroop, Suikerstroop is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Schenk Stroop, Suikerstroop
Suikerstroop.
Rinse appelstroop
Suikerbietenconcentraat, appelconcentraat, geleermiddel: pectine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schenk Stroop, Suikerstroop or Rinse appelstroop?
Overall, Rinse appelstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rinse appelstroop has fewer calories: 275 kcal versus 288 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rinse appelstroop has less sugar: 64.4 g versus 72 g per 100 g.