Comparison

Silverskin onions vs Silberzwiebeln

Overall, Silverskin onions has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSilverskin onionsSilberzwiebeln
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 34 kcal 45 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 4.6 g 2.9 g
Salt 0.3 g 3.3 g
Fiber 1.6 g 1.8 g
Protein 1 g 1 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Silverskin onions has 24% fewer calories (34 kcal vs 45 kcal).
  • Silberzwiebeln has 37% less sugar (2.9 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Silverskin onions has 92% less salt (0.3 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Silverskin onions has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Silverskin onions

ans and we will se pleased to replace or refund it,this y atied with this product please netum it to the store atnerstone, warwicksthire cv9 25h, rst and we will se pleased to replaer refund it ine you sautory fights, specially produced for: adi stores ltd, po box 26, aldi stores (neland) ltd, o box 726, naas, co, kildare, aldi www,aldi,com ea2eageej3

Silberzwiebeln

Silberzwiebeln, Essig, Speisesalz, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel (Citronensäure), Antioxidationsmittel (KALIUMMETABISULFIT)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Silverskin onions or Silberzwiebeln?

Overall, Silverskin onions has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Silverskin onions has fewer calories: 34 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Silberzwiebeln has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons