Sığır Etli Macar Hindi Dilim Salam vs Putenfleisch in Aspik
Overall, Putenfleisch in Aspik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sığır Etli Macar Hindi Dilim... | Putenfleisch in Aspik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 334 kcal | 83 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Putenfleisch in Aspik has 75% fewer calories (83 kcal vs 334 kcal).
- Putenfleisch in Aspik has 93% less fat (2 g vs 29 g).
- Putenfleisch in Aspik has 95% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 13 g).
- Sığır Etli Macar Hindi Dilim Salam has 88% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4 g).
- Putenfleisch in Aspik has 44% less salt (2 g vs 3.6 g).
- Sığır Etli Macar Hindi Dilim Salam has 33% more protein (18 g vs 12 g).
- Putenfleisch in Aspik has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sığır Etli Macar Hindi Dilim Salam
Ingrédients: Viande de dinde, graisse de boeuf, viande de bœuf, sel nitrite (sel, conservateur: E250), épices, poudre végétale (betteraves rouges), dextrose, antioxydants: E301, E392; extraits d' épices, cultures de maturation, fumée. 100g produit élaboré à partir de 86% viande de dinde et 10% viande de bœuf.
Putenfleisch in Aspik
Putenfleisch' gewürfelt, gegart (50%), Trinkwasser, Gurken (8%), Paprika (6%), Branntweinessig, Speisegelatine (Rind), Zucker, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte (Pfeffer, Knoblauch, Koriander, Lauch, Majoran), Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten. Weniger 3% als
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sığır Etli Macar Hindi Dilim Salam or Putenfleisch in Aspik?
Overall, Putenfleisch in Aspik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Putenfleisch in Aspik has fewer calories: 83 kcal versus 334 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sığır Etli Macar Hindi Dilim Salam has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.