Serpentini 500 g vs Blé cuisiné à la tomate et au basilic
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Serpentini 500 g | Blé cuisiné à la tomate et a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 5.6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blé cuisiné à la tomate et au basilic has 52% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 362 kcal).
- Serpentini 500 g has 26% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.3 g).
- Blé cuisiné à la tomate et au basilic has 85% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Blé cuisiné à la tomate et au basilic has 45% more fiber (5.6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Serpentini 500 g has 49% more protein (12 g vs 6.1 g).
- Serpentini 500 g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Serpentini 500 g lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Serpentini 500 g
Semoule de _blé_ dur de qualité supérieure
Blé cuisiné à la tomate et au basilic
Blé précuit à la vapeur (81%), double concentré de purée de tomates (7.8%); huile de tournesol, basilic (2.1%), poudre de tomates (1.8%), arôme naturel, sel, poivron rouge (déshydraté), extrait de levure, ail en poudre, oignons en poudre, acidifiant (acide citrique), épice, extrait de paprika.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Serpentini 500 g or Blé cuisiné à la tomate et au basilic?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blé cuisiné à la tomate et au basilic has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blé cuisiné à la tomate et au basilic has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.