Sélection de 3 riz vs Wildreis
Overall, Wildreis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sélection de 3 riz | Wildreis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wildreis has 43% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Only Sélection de 3 riz lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Sélection de 3 riz
Riz long étuvé (73%), riz long rouge (14%), riz sauvage (13%) Traces éventuelle de blé
Wildreis
Langkornrels 85%, Wildrels 15%. Mélange de riz à grain long parboiled et de riz sauvage Ingrédients: riz à grain long 85%, riz sauvage 15%. Miscela di riso a chicco lungo parboiled e riso selvatico Ingredienti: riso a chicco lungo 85%, riso selvatico 15%. Nährwerte | valeurs nutritives | valori nutritivi Energie | énergie | energia Fett matières grasses | grassi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sélection de 3 riz or Wildreis?
Overall, Wildreis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sélection de 3 riz has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sélection de 3 riz has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.