Seendamer vs Gouda in Scheiben
Overall, Gouda in Scheiben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Seendamer | Gouda in Scheiben |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 22.8 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda in Scheiben has 15% less fat (28 g vs 33 g).
- Gouda in Scheiben has 17% less saturated fat (19 g vs 22.8 g).
- Seendamer has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Gouda in Scheiben has 13% more protein (24 g vs 21 g).
- Gouda in Scheiben is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Seendamer
Käsereimilch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Farbstoff (Carotin).
Gouda in Scheiben
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch , Salz, Käsereikulturen (enthalten Milch), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff
FAQ
Which is healthier: Seendamer or Gouda in Scheiben?
Overall, Gouda in Scheiben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda in Scheiben has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Seendamer has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.