Seasoned mixed vegetables - Italian style vs Kaisergemüse
Overall, Kaisergemüse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Seasoned mixed vegetables -... | Kaisergemüse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaisergemüse has 20% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Kaisergemüse has 77% less fat (0.7 g vs 3.1 g).
- Kaisergemüse has 89% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Seasoned mixed vegetables - Italian style has 28% less sugar (2.6 g vs 3.6 g).
- Kaisergemüse has 95% less salt (0 g vs 0.7 g).
- Kaisergemüse has 60% more fiber (5 g vs 2 g).
- Kaisergemüse has 47% more protein (3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Kaisergemüse has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kaisergemüse is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Seasoned mixed vegetables - Italian style
Zucchetti, rote und gelbe Peperoni, Broccoli, Champignons, Zwiebeln, Cherrytomaten, pflanzliche Fette (Ölpalme, Kokospalme), schwarze Oliven (Oliven, Wasser, Speisesalz), Speisesalz, Gewürze, Rapsöl
Kaisergemüse
Gemüse in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen (Broccoli, Rosenkohl, Karotten)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Seasoned mixed vegetables - Italian style or Kaisergemüse?
Overall, Kaisergemüse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaisergemüse has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Seasoned mixed vegetables - Italian style has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.