Gemüsepfanne Französische Arr vs Kaisergemüse
Overall, Kaisergemüse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gemüsepfanne Französische Ar... | Kaisergemüse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaisergemüse has 26% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 54 kcal).
- Kaisergemüse has 59% less fat (0.7 g vs 1.7 g).
- Gemüsepfanne Französische Arr has 17% less sugar (3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Kaisergemüse has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Kaisergemüse has 43% more protein (3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kaisergemüse has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kaisergemüse is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Gemüsepfanne Französische Arr
Gemüse.(90%) (Zućchini', Broccoli', Karotten', Cherry-Tomaten', gelbe Karotten', Zwiebeln'), Kräuter', Olivenöl, Meersalz, Sonnenblumenöl, Honig', Gewürze
Kaisergemüse
Gemüse in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen (Broccoli, Rosenkohl, Karotten)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gemüsepfanne Französische Arr or Kaisergemüse?
Overall, Kaisergemüse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaisergemüse has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gemüsepfanne Französische Arr has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.