Schnittlauch vs Easy Sqeezy Cheese with Chives
Overall, Schnittlauch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schnittlauch | Easy Sqeezy Cheese with Chiv... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 187 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 12.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | — |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 11.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schnittlauch has 84% fewer calories (30 kcal vs 187 kcal).
- Schnittlauch has 96% less fat (0.5 g vs 12.2 g).
- Schnittlauch has 98% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 8 g).
- Schnittlauch has 50% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Schnittlauch has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.5 g).
- Easy Sqeezy Cheese with Chives has 78% more protein (11.5 g vs 2.6 g).
- Schnittlauch has the better Nutri-Score.
- Schnittlauch is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Easy Sqeezy Cheese with Chives lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Schnittlauch
Schnittlauch.
Easy Sqeezy Cheese with Chives
Cheese (48%) (Cheese (MILK), Medium Fat Soft Cheese (Medium Fat Soft Cheese (MILK), Sea Salt)), Partially Reconstituted Skimmed Milk Powder (Water, Skimmed MILK Powder), Whey Powder (MILK), Emulsifying Salts (Sodium Phosphate, Triphosphates, Polyphosphates), Modified Maize Starch, Chives (1%), Preservatives (Potassium Sorbate, Nisin)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schnittlauch or Easy Sqeezy Cheese with Chives?
Overall, Schnittlauch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schnittlauch has fewer calories: 30 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schnittlauch has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.