Comparison

Sauerkraut vs Thüringen Schlachtekraut

Overall, Sauerkraut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSauerkrautThüringen Schlachtekraut
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 27 kcal 43 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.7 g
Sugars 1.3 g 2.7 g
Salt 1 g 1.1 g
Fiber 1.3 g 1.9 g
Protein 1.4 g 1.7 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sauerkraut has 37% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 43 kcal).
  • Sauerkraut has 69% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Sauerkraut has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Sauerkraut has 52% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Thüringen Schlachtekraut has 33% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Thüringen Schlachtekraut has 18% more protein (1.7 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Thüringen Schlachtekraut has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sauerkraut is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Thüringen Schlachtekraut lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Sauerkraut

Weißkohl, 2% Weißwein, Speisesalz.

Thüringen Schlachtekraut

92% Sauerkraut (Weißkohl, Speisesalz), 2,3% Griebenschmalz (Schweinespeck, Flomen), Zucker, Aromen (enthält _Lactose_, _Soja_), Stärke, 1,0% geräucherte Schinkenwürfel (Schweinefleisch, Speisesalz, Glukosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Konservierungstof: Natriumnitrit, Rauch), Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Karottenwürfel, Gewürze.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sauerkraut or Thüringen Schlachtekraut?

Overall, Sauerkraut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sauerkraut has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sauerkraut has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons