Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne vs Saucisson
Overall, Saucisson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisson sec à la Tomme de... | Saucisson |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 395 kcal | 428 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 4.9 g | 4.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisson has 13% less saturated fat (13 g vs 15 g).
- Saucisson has 11% more protein (28 g vs 25 g).
Ingredients
Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne
Viande de porc (origine: France), tomme de montagne 8,5% (lait de vache, sel, présure animale, ferments lactiques), sel, lactose, dextrose, épices, ail, antioxydant: érythorbate de sodium, conservateur: nitrate de potassium, ferments.
Saucisson
Viande de porc, gras de porc, fromage Fourme d'Ambert 12% (Lait cru vache), sel, Lactose, sirop de glucose, dextrose, epice, plante aromatiques, conservateurs nitrate de potassium, ferments, boyau collagénique de boeuf comestible.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne or Saucisson?
Overall, Saucisson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne has fewer calories: 395 kcal versus 428 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.