Comparison

Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne vs Les petites tranches "comté"

Overall, Les petites tranches "comté" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaucisson sec à la Tomme de...Les petites tranches "c...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 395 kcal 318 kcal
Fat 32 g 16.5 g
Saturated fat 15 g 6.5 g
Sugars 1.7 g 2.2 g
Salt 4.9 g 11.3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 25 g 40.1 g
Additives20
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Les petites tranches "comté" has 19% fewer calories (318 kcal vs 395 kcal).
  • Les petites tranches "comté" has 48% less fat (16.5 g vs 32 g).
  • Les petites tranches "comté" has 57% less saturated fat (6.5 g vs 15 g).
  • Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne has 23% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne has 56% less salt (4.9 g vs 11.3 g).
  • Les petites tranches "comté" has 38% more protein (40.1 g vs 25 g).
  • Only Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne

Viande de porc (origine: France), tomme de montagne 8,5% (lait de vache, sel, présure animale, ferments lactiques), sel, lactose, dextrose, épices, ail, antioxydant: érythorbate de sodium, conservateur: nitrate de potassium, ferments.

Les petites tranches "comté"

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne or Les petites tranches "comté"?

Overall, Les petites tranches "comté" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Les petites tranches "comté" has fewer calories: 318 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saucisson sec à la Tomme de Montagne has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons