Comparison

Les mini bûchettes - fromage de chèvre vs Les petites tranches "comté"

Overall, Les petites tranches "comté" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLes mini bûchettes - fromage...Les petites tranches "c...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 546 kcal 318 kcal
Fat 45 g 16.5 g
Saturated fat 17 g 6.5 g
Sugars 1.5 g 2.2 g
Salt 6 g 11.3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 32 g 40.1 g
Additives10
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Les petites tranches "comté" has 42% fewer calories (318 kcal vs 546 kcal).
  • Les petites tranches "comté" has 63% less fat (16.5 g vs 45 g).
  • Les petites tranches "comté" has 62% less saturated fat (6.5 g vs 17 g).
  • Les mini bûchettes - fromage de chèvre has 32% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Les mini bûchettes - fromage de chèvre has 47% less salt (6 g vs 11.3 g).
  • Les petites tranches "comté" has 20% more protein (40.1 g vs 32 g).
  • Only Les mini bûchettes - fromage de chèvre lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Les mini bûchettes - fromage de chèvre

Viande de porc, fromage de chèvre: LAIT de chèvre-sel-ferments lactiques-coagulant, LACTOSE, sel, saccharose, dextrose, épices et plante aromatique, conservateurs: nitrate de potassium-nitrite de sodium, ferments,

Les petites tranches "comté"

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Les mini bûchettes - fromage de chèvre or Les petites tranches "comté"?

Overall, Les petites tranches "comté" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Les petites tranches "comté" has fewer calories: 318 kcal versus 546 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Les mini bûchettes - fromage de chèvre has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons