Les petites tranches "comté" vs Saucisson sec comté
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Les petites tranches "c... | Saucisson sec comté |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 304 kcal |
| Fat | 16.5 g | 22.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 11.3 g | 4.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 40.1 g | 26.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Les petites tranches "comté" has 25% less fat (16.5 g vs 22.1 g).
- Saucisson sec comté has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Saucisson sec comté has 57% less salt (4.8 g vs 11.3 g).
- Les petites tranches "comté" has 34% more protein (40.1 g vs 26.4 g).
- Only Saucisson sec comté lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Les petites tranches "comté"
Not available.
Saucisson sec comté
Viande de porc* 90% (France), Comté AOP* (lait) 7%, sel, sucre de canne*, épices*, plantes aromatiques*, betterave rouge*, ferments, boyau naturel de porc. 146g de viande de porc utilisée pour 100g de produit fini. *Issu de l'agriculture biologique Issu du commerce équitable Traces éventuelles de céleri
FAQ
Which is healthier: Les petites tranches "comté" or Saucisson sec comté?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisson sec comté has fewer calories: 304 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisson sec comté has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.