Les petites tranches "comté" vs Saucisson
Overall, Les petites tranches "comté" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Les petites tranches "comté"
Saucisson
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Les petites tranches "c... | Saucisson |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 428 kcal |
| Fat | 16.5 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 11.3 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 40.1 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Les petites tranches "comté" has 26% fewer calories (318 kcal vs 428 kcal).
- Les petites tranches "comté" has 50% less fat (16.5 g vs 33 g).
- Les petites tranches "comté" has 50% less saturated fat (6.5 g vs 13 g).
- Saucisson has 18% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.2 g).
- Saucisson has 58% less salt (4.7 g vs 11.3 g).
- Les petites tranches "comté" has 30% more protein (40.1 g vs 28 g).
- Only Saucisson lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Les petites tranches "comté"
Not available.
Saucisson
Viande de porc, gras de porc, fromage Fourme d'Ambert 12% (Lait cru vache), sel, Lactose, sirop de glucose, dextrose, epice, plante aromatiques, conservateurs nitrate de potassium, ferments, boyau collagénique de boeuf comestible.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Les petites tranches "comté" or Saucisson?
Overall, Les petites tranches "comté" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Les petites tranches "comté" has fewer calories: 318 kcal versus 428 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisson has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.