Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g vs Ángulo
Overall, Ángulo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g
Ángulo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP... | Ángulo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 327 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 29.2 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 15.7 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ángulo has 77% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 327 kcal).
- Ángulo has 83% less fat (5 g vs 29.2 g).
- Ángulo has 71% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 12.1 g).
- Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g has 78% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Ángulo has 88% less salt (0.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g has 62% more protein (15.7 g vs 6 g).
- Ángulo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Ángulo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g lists: Gluten.
- Only Ángulo lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g
Viande de porc, sel, saccharose, dextrose de blé, poivre, carvi, conservateurs : salpètre, nitritre de sodium. Boyau naturel de porc.
Ángulo
leche pasterizada de vaca cuajo y sal. Origen de la leche: España.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g or Ángulo?
Overall, Ángulo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ángulo has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 327 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.