Comparison

4 chèvre chauds vs Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g

Overall, 4 chèvre chauds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient4 chèvre chaudsSaucisse de Montbéliard IGP...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 319 kcal 327 kcal
Fat 23 g 29.2 g
Saturated fat 13 g 12.1 g
Sugars 2.2 g 0.4 g
Salt 1.3 g 2.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 14 g 15.7 g
Additives01
AllergensMilkGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 4 chèvre chauds has 21% less fat (23 g vs 29.2 g).
  • Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g has 82% less sugar (0.4 g vs 2.2 g).
  • 4 chèvre chauds has 38% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g has 11% more protein (15.7 g vs 14 g).
  • 4 chèvre chauds has the better Nutri-Score.
  • 4 chèvre chauds is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only 4 chèvre chauds lists: Milk.
  • Only Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

4 chèvre chauds

_Lait_ de vache pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant.

Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g

Viande de porc, sel, saccharose, dextrose de blé, poivre, carvi, conservateurs : salpètre, nitritre de sodium. Boyau naturel de porc.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 4 chèvre chauds or Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g?

Overall, 4 chèvre chauds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

4 chèvre chauds has fewer calories: 319 kcal versus 327 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saucisse de Montbéliard IGP VPF à cuire 2x150g has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons