Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF vs Salchichón Costa Brava
Overall, Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF
Salchichón Costa Brava
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisse de Montbéliard cuit... | Salchichón Costa Brava |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 1 | 6 |
| Allergens | Pork | Milk, Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has 14% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 372 kcal).
- Salchichón Costa Brava has 15% less saturated fat (9.4 g vs 11 g).
- Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has 63% less sugar (1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has 49% less salt (1.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Salchichón Costa Brava has 27% more protein (22 g vs 16 g).
- Only Salchichón Costa Brava lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF
pork, salt, spices, sucrose, dextrose, preservative: sodium nitrite
Salchichón Costa Brava
pork, bacon, lactose, salt, milk proteins, dextrose, spices, stabilizers (e-450, e-451), antioxidant flavors (e 301), preservatives (e-250, e-252) and dye (e-120),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF or Salchichón Costa Brava?
Overall, Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisse de Montbéliard cuite IGP-VPF has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.