Comparison

Sauce tomate aux cèpes vs Chunky Mushroom Pasta Sauce

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSauce tomate aux cèpesChunky Mushroom Pasta Sauce
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 61 kcal 39 kcal
Fat 2.9 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0 g
Sugars 3.9 g 6.2 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber 2 g 1.3 g
Protein 1.4 g 1.6 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chunky Mushroom Pasta Sauce has 36% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 61 kcal).
  • Chunky Mushroom Pasta Sauce has 97% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Chunky Mushroom Pasta Sauce has no saturated fat, while Sauce tomate aux cèpes has 0.3 g.
  • Sauce tomate aux cèpes has 38% less sugar (3.9 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Sauce tomate aux cèpes has 36% more fiber (2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Sauce tomate aux cèpes is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Sauce tomate aux cèpes

Tomate* (pulpe de tomates* et double concentré de tomates*) 64%, cèpe* réhydraté 7,9%, purée de carottes, oignon, champignon de Paris* 5%, huile de tournesol désodorisée*, ail*, sel de mer, poivre noir*. *Ingrédients agricoles issus de l'Agriculture Biologique

Chunky Mushroom Pasta Sauce

TOMATOES (53%), CONCENTRATED TOMATO PURÉE (21%), MUSHROOMS (12%), Water, ONION (4%) Sugar, Onion Powder, Modified Maize Starch, Salt, BASIL (0.5%), Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid, Flavouring Herbs, Garlic Powder.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sauce tomate aux cèpes or Chunky Mushroom Pasta Sauce?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chunky Mushroom Pasta Sauce has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sauce tomate aux cèpes has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons