Sauce soja salée vs DEVOS LEMMENS mayonaise citroen
Overall, Sauce soja salée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Sauce soja salée
DEVOS LEMMENS mayonaise citroen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sauce soja salée | DEVOS LEMMENS mayonaise citr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 739 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 81 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 6.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 17.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | — |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Eggs, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sauce soja salée has 91% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 739 kcal).
- Sauce soja salée has 99% less fat (0.5 g vs 81 g).
- Sauce soja salée has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 6.5 g).
- Sauce soja salée has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- DEVOS LEMMENS mayonaise citroen has 93% less salt (1.2 g vs 17.2 g).
- Sauce soja salée has 87% more protein (9.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Sauce soja salée is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sauce soja salée lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
- Only DEVOS LEMMENS mayonaise citroen lists: Eggs, Mustard.
Ingredients
Sauce soja salée
water, soybeans, salt, wheat
DEVOS LEMMENS mayonaise citroen
rapeseed oil, egg yolk from ground-raised hens 7.5%, vinegar, mustard (vinegar, mustard seeds, water, salt, spices), water, sugar, lemon juice 1.2%, salt, antioxidant: e385, flavours
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sauce soja salée or DEVOS LEMMENS mayonaise citroen?
Overall, Sauce soja salée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sauce soja salée has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 739 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauce soja salée has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.