Comparison

Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie vs Oatmeal Raisin Cookies

Overall, Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSanta Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Co...Oatmeal Raisin Cookies
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 452 kcal 459 kcal
Fat 14.5 g 17.6 g
Saturated fat 6.5 g 7.1 g
Sugars 38.7 g 38.8 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.1 g
Fiber 3.2 g 3.5 g
Protein 6.5 g 7.1 g
Additives52
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie has 18% less fat (14.5 g vs 17.6 g).
  • Only Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie

Enriched Wheat Flour (Flour, Niacin, Reduced Iron, Thiamine Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Raisins, Oats, Vegetable Oils (Palm Oil, Soybean Oil, Hydrogenated Soybean Oil), Sugar, Fructose, Brown Sugar (Sugar, Invert Sugar, Molasses), Eggs, Cornstarch, Raising Agents (E503ii, E500ii), Salt, Skimmed Milk, Natural Flavor, Spices, Cinnamon, Emulsifier (E322).

Oatmeal Raisin Cookies

Butter, Unbleached flour (_wheat_ flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamine mononitrate, ribflavin, folic acid, malted barley flour), Oats, Brown cane sugar, Cane sugar, Raisins, _Eggs_, _Milk_, Salt, Baking Soda, Natural vanilla flavor, Cinnamon

FAQ

Which is healthier: Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie or Oatmeal Raisin Cookies?

Overall, Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie has fewer calories: 452 kcal versus 459 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Santa Cruz Oatmeal Raisin Cookie has less sugar: 38.7 g versus 38.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons