Salsa pronta di pomodoro siccagno vs Macco di fave
Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Salsa pronta di pomodoro siccagno
Macco di fave
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salsa pronta di pomodoro sic... | Macco di fave |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 9.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa pronta di pomodoro siccagno has 54% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 109 kcal).
- Salsa pronta di pomodoro siccagno has 65% less fat (1.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Salsa pronta di pomodoro siccagno has 67% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Macco di fave has 75% less sugar (2.4 g vs 9.4 g).
- Macco di fave has 84% more protein (6.3 g vs 1 g).
- Macco di fave has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Salsa pronta di pomodoro siccagno
Not available.
Macco di fave
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salsa pronta di pomodoro siccagno or Macco di fave?
Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa pronta di pomodoro siccagno has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Macco di fave has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 9.4 g per 100 g.